Trump International Hotel in the historic Post Office Pavilion -Washington D.C |
The historic Post Office Pavilion in Washington, DC is at
the center of a hot procurement debate. Since 2012, the building is under lease
by the Trump Organization to operate a luxury hotel. With Jan. 20th
looming over the United States as we wait for President-Elect Trump’s
inauguration, Mr. Trump’s business ties with the General Services
Administration are coming to the forefront of the debate.
The Post Office lease between the GSA
and the Trump Organization is a 60-year, $180 million-dollar deal that is
now at the center of constitutional scrutiny. Contract language is clear: “No
... elected official of the Government of the United States ... shall be
admitted to any share or part of this Lease, or to any benefit that may arise
therefrom....”(top
of page 103 Ground Lease) . As
things stand right now, not only would Mr. Trump profit and be in clear
violation of this contractual clause, there are other delineating factors to
consider; Mr. Trump will now be the individual in charge of appointing a new
GSA administrator, a person who would be directly involved in negotiations and
changes to the contract he holds, including but not limited to rent increase.
The contractual question is whether a blind
trust run by Mr. Trump’s children is truly blind enough to be considered
separate from the President Elect. Especially considering his children having
active roles in Mr. Trump’s transition
team and interacting with foreign officials, the lines between business
government are being blurred. Although Trump’s team is sighting a Dec
15th conference, where Mr. Trump’s involvement in his own
business will be cleared up, the mixing of his family in both business and
government does raise concerns for many in Washington.
Government procurement experts are urging
the GSA to terminate the lease before Mr. Trump’s inauguration, however
this is the first time that the GSA has acknowledged this as a potential
problem. Whether the conflict of interest that this situation produces is
valid, the contract clauses the govern the situation seem clear and lays out a
way for the GSA.